Buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude and Google AI Overviews which software to buy and get a shortlist. The model takes it from listicles, not from your site or your G2 page. We get your product into those listicles, in the questions where the answer is still open, and measure your mention share before and after.
"best identity governance software for a 300-person company"
"alternatives to [the incumbent] for a small team"
"which project management tool fits a remote dev team"
"Best CRM" belongs to aggregators and incumbents. The narrow questions above are where a product with a real strength gets named within weeks. Buyers use four kinds of prompts: problem ("how do we manage access for 300 people"), discovery ("best identity governance software"), comparison ("X vs Y", "X alternatives") and trust ("is X SOC 2 compliant"). The campaign targets discovery and comparison prompts; your own pages answer the other two.
Not a theory. The searches below are what ChatGPT and Claude actually ran when we asked them which software to buy.
The assistant does not look up your name. It splits "best identity governance software for a 300-person company" into searches: the category and its synonyms, the use case, "alternatives", "pricing", "reviews", "2026". In our tests ChatGPT ran 3 to 7 searches per answer, Claude 2. Google calls this query fan-out.
"Best X software" roundups, G2 and Capterra category pages, alternatives pages, vendors' comparison pages. ChatGPT fetches them live with its crawlers; Google AI Overviews read Google's index. If you are in none of these pages, you are out before the model has formed an opinion.
The model keeps the names that several sources agree on and drops the rest. Ratings and "best for" lines are copied from those pages. One list is an opinion. Five lists with the same five names is a consensus.
Before recommending, the model checks your site: the use-case page, pricing tier, integrations, compliance, and whether G2 and Capterra say the same. Invented numbers, a mismatch or a blocked crawler, and the name is dropped.
Our work is step 2: we put you into the lists those searches return. The lift in visibility shows one to two weeks after the campaign.
Classic SEO meant ranking your pages on Google. LLM optimization means being named when a buyer asks an AI which software to buy. It is also called LLM SEO, generative engine optimization (GEO), answer engine optimization (AEO) or AI search optimization. Same job, different source: the answer is built from lists, not from your page.
AI answers about software come from "best X software" lists with ratings and comparison tables. The head questions belong to aggregators and incumbents. The open ones are narrow: a use case, an alternative to a named incumbent, a compliance or size requirement.
Your own pages and your G2 profile count for little in the answer itself. Self-promotional lists get about a tenth of citations, third-party lists the rest.
Peec AI, analysis of 232,000 citations, December 2025 to February 2026.
Models also drop what they cannot verify. An article that invents a price or a rating for your product gets discounted. We use ratings only as published on G2 or Capterra and describe pricing as a tier, never as a number you did not publish.
We add the missing lists: on sites the crawlers read, naming you in the open questions next to the competitors buyers already compare you with.
Geography rarely narrows a software question. Use case, alternatives and requirements do.
"Best [category] for [use case]", "[incumbent] alternatives for [segment]", "[category] with SOC 2". Not "best CRM".
10 answers per prompt from ChatGPT, Claude and Google AI Overviews before anything is published.
30 listicles, published in stages over 10 working days. Each names you next to real competitors, with ratings as published and pricing as a tier, on sites LLM crawlers visit.
Daily tracking. Report in week 3 to 4: mention share per surface, before and after, with dates.
A use-case page with proof already exists on your site. We start placements right away.
We build that page first, then placements. Models check your site before they recommend you.
Measured on live campaigns, with dates. Your category may move slower. We say so before you pay.
Campaign 1: 30 listicles in the SEO data API category, published 21 July 2026, tracked until 19 August 2026 on five target keywords in Google AI Overviews and buyer prompts in ChatGPT and Claude.
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Target keywords named in 100% of AI Overview checks | 1 of 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Worst AI Overview position among the target keywords | #9 | #1 |
| Claude checks naming DataForSEO, on two of the buyer prompts | 0% | 100% |
▶StackBob · Ole Shved, CPO · 1:52 · YouTube
From stealth to named in ChatGPT, Claude and Google AI Overviews within two weeks of the campaign.
“We are a B2B security platform. We now get mentioned across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT and Claude.”
Enough to build a consensus where the answer is still open. Most SaaS start here.
Twice the volume for a category where established vendors already sit in the lists.
Scoped on the call.
Tracking for a month is included. The placement report lists every live URL.
We show you your category prompts, who the models name today, and the open question where 30 placements are enough. Free, whether you buy or not.